Celebrating the Unpopular Arts

The Greg Hatcher Legacy Files #45: ‘The Year-End Thing’

[A quick one today, which was posted on 4 January 2014 and which you can find here. Greg reiterates some things we’ve seen recently (of course, back then they were spread out a bit more), and mentions Stan Sakai’s family’s problems, which I left in there – with a link! – just because. Enjoy!]

Looking back at the last year, I find … that all of us comics blog types over the last couple of weeks are writing about the last year. So here I am doing it too. What can I say? The peer pressure’s too much for me.

I’m not fool enough to think I can sum it all up, and this isn’t any kind of best-of or anything, but here are a few things that stuck out for me this last year.


Nicest surprise: The Black Bat, from Dynamite Comics. Usually I’m a sucker for Dynamite’s pulp revivals, but I honestly was going to skip this one, despite being rather fond of the original Black Bat stories from way back when.

But then I got this other gig that was kind of similar, so I picked up a random issue of this book just because I wanted to make sure I didn’t inadvertently echo anything Brian Buccellato was doing. And I was completely sucked in. I liked it enough to keep getting it and even hunted up the back issues.

Of course, the elephant in the room with the Black Bat is that even though he came first, trying to put him in comics means you have to make him different from Batman. And previously, the efforts to do that have been so strained and obvious that the comics that emerged were a mess. Even worse, the civilian identity of the Bat is Tony Quinn, blind defense lawyer, and the Black Bat has enhanced senses. So you’ve got the Daredevil thing to contend with, too. You want it to be enough like the pulps that you get the people who are fans of the original, but you don’t want it to look like you’ve copied other current superhero books, and somehow after all that you want it to feel fresh and new. Good luck with all that.

And you know what? Brian Bucellato and Roman Cliquet did it. They threaded the needle. Here, let them give you the setup …

Making Tony Quinn not just a lawyer but a corrupt mob lawyer who’s now trying to fight his way back to some kind of redemption … that one change makes all the difference. Instantly it’s become its own thing and it really works for me, as does the relentless pulp-action, hell-for-leather vibe of the book. I like Roman Cliquet’s art a lot, too. It’s just a great ride. Something I expected to not enjoy at all, I liked a lot. I love it when that happens.


Most embarrassing display and lamest apology: Boy, we had a lot of contenders for this one. For a while I was just going to suggest a blanket win for all the convention sexual harassment apologists, because it was too difficult to pick just one. The cosplay stuff especially [Edit: sorry, dead link!] just boggles my mind. Seriously, to all the guys out there defending that behavior or saying it’s just how it is, girls, so live with it, what the hell is wrong with you?

But then came Shia LeBoeuf and his utter, complete inability to grasp what he actually did to Daniel Clowes, [Edit: sorry, another dead link!] despite all his various apologies culminating in this banner he paid to have towed through the sky … somewhere. Probably not anywhere Daniel Clowes actually was, though the internet picked it up quickly enough.

But that’s not really how apologies work anyway. Clearly, Mr. LeBoeuf is too much of a deranged narcissist to really grasp the concept. His idea seems to be that the rest of us will SEE him making an apology and then we’ll … what? Applaud? Forgive him? Resume giving him cash to see his stolen story on film? Is that the endgame? Because I think that ship sailed.

Here is how an apology is supposed to work, for the benefit of all those people in the news that keep failing at it so spectacularly.

First, you acknowledge your own wrongdoing. That means you don’t say, “I’m sorry you were offended.” You say, “I apologize for being so offensive.” In other words, you agree that the offended party’s reaction makes sense in context because YOU DID A BAD THING. YOU WERE WRONG. Own up, cowards. “I’m sorry if anyone was offended” isn’t an apology at all, it’s just being a bigger jerk.

Then, you try to make restitution. In the case of LeBoeuf, it’s easy — he can pay Mr. Clowes for his story, like he should have done in the first place, and make sure that all future prints of the film in every format credit Dan Clowes for the story. Right up front with the names in large print, not somewhere buried in the end credits in the micro-print. Mr. LeBoeuf might also consider apologizing to all the people who worked on this film with him — I’m thinking of Jim Gaffigan, who stars in it, but there are lots of others — who now can never take credit for their work on the project without getting smeared as co-conspirators. Instead, Shia LeBoeuf chose to pay an airplane advertising firm to wave a flag. I looked it up — that costs about $500 an hour. LeBoeuf could have just given Clowes that cash and I bet it would have gone further towards cleaning up the mess.

Not to go on and on about it but this particular failure at public apology is such a perfect illustration of why so many public apologies are so lame. No one ever seems to make the final leap and finish the process, which is to say, you learn the lesson and stop doing the offensive thing. Not only has Mr. LeBoeuf not learned it, I’m not convinced he actually even knows what he did wrong. Which is apparently true of a lot of serial sexual harassers at comics conventions, too.


Most Endearing Professional Fanboy Quirk: JUST under the wire; I came home with this on the last day of 2013. John Byrne has revived the Star Trek Fotonovel for this year’s Star Trek Annual from IDW.

Something that no one was clamoring for (Seriously. No one.) Fotonovels were a brief fad back in the 1970s. They didn’t last long and the consensus among everyone, even the hardcore fans buying the then-current paperback prose adaptations of Star Trek episodes, was that Fotonovels pretty much sucked. Even viewed through the rosy lens of nostalgia, they are still hideous non-books.

But you know what? This remixed-image Annual works. I kinda like it. Byrne’s cut together the images with a comics artist’s eye and he has the advantage of Photoshop, and what he’s put together is a nice little sequel to “Where No Man Has Gone Before.”

Not something you want to do a lot, it would wear out its welcome in a hurry. But for a one-off like an annual, sure.


Least Endearing Professional Fanboy Quirk: DC continuing to namecheck its history without any interest in actually evoking that history.

The easiest example is Topo from Aquaman. Once he looked like this. A cheerful octopus that liked to play music and help with the milking …

And now he looks like this. Some sort of Lovecraftian H.R. Giger hellspawn that looks like a hentai tentacle monster mated with a rotting lobster.

If Geoff Johns wants Aquaman to be pals with a hentai monster, okay, I can go with it … but why in the world then name it “Topo”? What kind of weird fanboy OCD is that? I have no idea why anyone thinks this kind of not-revival is a good idea. As a joke it’s not funny, it’s just weird. As an insult to older folks it’s kind of lame. As an inside-baseball Easter egg it’s … still pretty lame.

But DC keeps doing it. This has been going on at least since they had Wonder Dog eat Marvin and cripple Wendy over in Teen Titans a few years ago and it hasn’t gotten any less odd. Who’s this for? That’s what I keep wondering. It’s not a revival, it’s not a joke, it’s not something anyone asked for (show of hands — how many of you felt like Aquaman needed to bring back Topo the octopus?) So what’s the point?


Favorite Reprint Project: Dear God, so MANY good ones. But the one I loved the most was the Archie Goodwin Batman hardcover.

My desert island Batman book. If I could only have one it would be this one.


Favorite New Title: I can’t decide between Batman ’66 and The Shadow Now.

Both terrific and both of them just appeared as if by magic on days when I was feeling really grumpy about superhero comics. So I’m declaring it a tie. Because this is my year-end wrapup fake awards column and I can make up the rules as I go if I feel like it. Don’t judge me.


Favorite Crowdfunded Comics Project: I am so overjoyed that the Middleman is coming back, [Edit: obviously, a dead link] words fail me.

Here’s hoping it’s such a huge success it becomes an annual event.


Favorite Announcement About Upcoming Books: Can’t think of anything to top my pleasure at hearing we’re getting more Jonah Hex, especially the Vertigo stuff getting collected.


Least Favorite Announcement About Upcoming Books: This isn’t really an announcement, at least not as of this writing. I dunno if it’s official. But it sure looks like Marvel is phasing out the Essential paperback series in favor of the Epic Collections. I hope I’m wrong about this. The Essentials are just about my favorite thing going and I love that DC finally caught up with doing the Showcase Presents books as well.


That’s about all I’ve got about 2013. It was really a pretty good year for us, but it was so rough on so many of our friends that it was hard to enjoy it. In particular, if you can spare some kind thoughts — and maybe a little cash for the CAPS auction — for Stan Sakai and his family, that would sure be awesome.

Let’s hope 2014 treats us all well. See you next week.


  1. One more thing about apologies: you need to offer one to the person you gave offense to. Going on Twitter or FB or wherever and telling your audience/clients/neighbors how bad and remorseful you feel is just reputation management.
    The offended party is fully entitled not to want to hear it but that’s not an excuse.

  2. Jeff Nettleton

    I don’t recall if I ever looked at one of the Star Trek Fotonovels or not; I was aware of them. I did read a few of those episode guides, where they adapted the plot, as a short story. I did own a Buck Rogers Fotonovel, of the theatrical film and recall flipping through the Battlestar Galactica pilot film and once for Cheech & Chong’s The Corsican Brothers.

    They were fine, for what they were, especially if you missed a movie; but, they had a tendency to fall apart, if you weren’t delicate with them, if you tried to see more of the image, near the inner edge.

    The Aquaman portion kind of sums up why I stopped reading most mainstream comics, in the early 00s; it just felt like a retread of 20 year old material, with more violence. Johns did a lot of it and others did too. They’d rake up bronze Age properties, to a cynical and violent make-over, then retread the same plots, with less fun. I have yet to enjoy a Freedom Fighters remake and the original wasn’t that good; but, it was more interesting an attempt to do something with the Quality Comics characters. Really, DC missed the boat by not doing a series exploring them secretly battling the Nazis, when they controlled the world. That’s part of why they never topped their JLA two-parter; after that, they were just another super team, though they were wanted fugitives, which gave some propulsion to the plots.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.